Back
Introduction
Philosophers
Seneca
Laozi
Fields
Metaphysics
Axiology
Epistemology
Logos
Schools of thought
Stoicism
Hedonism
Marxism
Taoism
Relativism
Buddhism
Positivism
Realism
Pragmatism

Notes on philosophy

Introduction

For as long as I can remember, I have loved philosophy. I consider it a pillar of my own self. If I were one day not to care for wisdom anymore, that in itself would be proof that I indeed have died inside. My life has not been free of adversity, far from it, but my love of wisdom has never seized.

These are but notes on philosophy. I went the route of art, and have no formal education in this subject although I would have loved to have one; I could not stand my lack of knowledge when it came to philosophical terms and history, famous philosophers - so these are my notes - a sharing of my own journey in learning.
Much is simplified, far too short to truly mirror the complexity, and of course there are many, many terms and branches not mentioned here. I also consider this a flexible document; I might edit it at any time.

When philosophy first became a word (from greek: Philos ∙ love - Sophia ∙ wisdom), many branches we now consider separate (such as psychology, biology, sociology etc.) were still under the umbrella of philosophy. As we have, over time, found certain accepted answers to the inner workings of the world, fields of studies have emigrated, like apples from the tree of philosophy.
Other branches were more abstract, such as metaphysics, and never made this emigration.

Today it seems silly to ponder where the rain in the clouds comes from for too long - we can simply google it, if we can't remember from school - but for a long time it wasn't silly at all. And even though it sometimes feels like all is discovered and mankinds collective knowledge is so vast, there are still a million questions and more worth asking; some of them might actually have an answer, others do not (at least not in singular form).

It is in the question, in the wondering, in the subjective realizations - that the value of philosophy lies, in addition to the answers it has already given us. And that is my own axiological pondering on philosophy itself; if you'd like to know what axiology is (I didn't know two days ago) then just scroll a tad bit down.

Philosophers

This is the part where I talk (read: write) about various philosophers as I come across them.

Seneca

Reading On the shortness of life by Seneca was an absolute pleasure. There is something about this book, despite its age, that is so relevant still. Senecas full name was Lucius Annaeus Seneca, and he was known as Seneca the younger or simply Seneca. He lived to experience year 0, as he was born only 4 years BC, and died 65 years after. He was born in Hispania, on the Iberian peninsula, which was at that time part of the Roman empire.
Seneca was a stoic. He didn't approve of hedonism, and preferred a simple lifestyle. On the shortness of life is writted in a way that is most human and true, and many times did I forget that it was in fact an almost 2000 year old text. Seneca speaks a lot about leisure in this book, and it came at a fitting time for me. I struggle with stress, struggle to find leisure. Even when I have time, I struggle to relax. Leisure, to Seneca is complicated and he has several opinions on what is not leisure but disguises itself as it, and that is thus a waste of time - in fact, the only thing that is always, undoubtably worthy of time in life according to Seneca, is philosophy. He writes quite beautifully about belonging to a philosophical school - choosing to learn from philosophers instead of our parents, who may have passed on terrible and destructive ideas to us that we didn't ask for. We didn't choose our parents, but we can choose who we look up to.

"We are in the habit of saying that it was not in our power to choose the parents who were allotted to us, that they were given to us by chance. But we can choose whose children we would like to be. There are households of the noblest intellects: choose the one into which you wish to be adopted, and you will inherit not only their name but their property too. Nor will this property need to be guarded meanly or grudgingly: the more it is shared out, the greater it will become. These will offer you a path to immortality and raise you to a point from which no one is cast down."

An interesting chapter in this book, is the one called Consolation to Helia. Here, Seneca speaks to his own mother, consoling her in a time of grief. Trying to help her, he mentions both the terrible things she have had to endure in life, and the people around her who love her. He mentions how, despite her being a woman and not allowed money, she has been in charge of finances in their family and have done well in caring for that. I found it an interesting peak into womens history from the Roman empire, 2000 years ago.

"You administered our inheritances as though you were earnestly looking after your own and being scrupulously provident with another's; you were cautious in using our influence, as if it were someone else's, and in our spells in office you had no part except your pleasure and the expenses."

"0 how many noble deeds of women are lost in obscurity! If she had chanced to live in the days of old when people frankly admired heroism, how men of genius would have competed to sing the praises of a wife who ignored her physical weakness, ignored the sea which even the bravest must fear, and risked her life to give her husband burial; and while her thoughts were on his funeral had no fears about her own! All the poets have given renown to the woman who offered to die in place of her husband. But this is nobler, to risk one's life to bury one's husband: for that love is greater which wins less through equal danger."

Seneca believed that any one person should study philosophy - his own mother also - and that they should also make themselves useful to the community if at all possible. He had great respect for teachers who instilled in their students virtues- the idea of virtues are after all an integral part of stoicism.

The four virtues of Stoicism

  • Wisdom:
  • Courage:
  • Justice:
  • Temperance:

    Although Seneca believed that one should be at service to the community, he also achnowledged that is is sometimes important for a person to retreat from public life.

    "Just as certain wholesome substances do us good by their odour even without tasting or touching them, so Virtue spreads her advantages even from a distant hiding place."

    And so we have philosophy, virtue and community as integral parts of a good life, according to Seneca - and, he also advocated for frugality. Another important aspect, he says, is friendship.

    "But nothing delights the mind so much as fond and loyal friendship. What a blessing it is to have hearts that are ready and willing to receive all your secrets in safety, with whom you are less afraid to share knowledge of something than keep it to yourself, whose conversation soothes your distress, whose advice helps you make up your mind, whose cheerfulness dissolves your sorrow, whose very appearance cheers you up!"

    On the shortness of life shares wisdom on how to live a long life; time is relative after all, as we know today. It does not stop for anyone, and yet we have all experienced how some minutes feel like hours and years flew by like days. As I am diagnosed with a chronic depression disorder, I have often felt that life is too long. However, I am trying to give up my habit of dissociating, which is threatening to steal my life away. Despite life sometimes feeling too long, I have decided, after much thinking, that it is not to be squandered still. We all die in the end, there is no hurry. I might as well make use of the time I have; and suddenly, feeling a need to live a good and valuable life, I am also realizing that presence is a key to that. Presence has been an enemy on mine, for it strengthens not only the good, but the bad in life as well. However, I must become present, as much as I can, or else my life will become terribly short, no matter how long I live.

    Towards the end of the book, he summarizes briefly what one should remember in order to live a long life - for it is, as he says, long if you know how to use it.

    "We must indulge the mind and from time to time allow it the leisure which is its food and strength. We must go for walks out of doors, so that the mind can be strengthened and invigorated by a clear sky and plenty of fresh air. At times it will acquire fresh energy from a journey by carriage and a change of scene, or from socializing and drinking freely. Occasion ally we should even come to the point of intoxication, sinking into drink but not being totally flooded by it; for it does wash away cares, and stirs the mind to its depths, and heals sorrow just as it heals certain diseases."


    Laozi

    Reading the Tao Te Ching was like reading poetic riddles. I enjoyed it profoundly, although I feel that it needs to settle. I borrowed the book in the library, but I think I need to read it again in a few weeks. It doesn't take a long time to read through it, and yet people spend their lives reading it. Reading it, I understand why.
    Taoism, or daoism is a branch of philosophy, and a religion as well. The Tao Te Ching spends much time attempting to explain what tao really is, while also achknowledging that it cannot be explained, resulting in what feels like riddles. Some things have no simple answer. A recent theme of my life has been the practice of listening without the need of understanding, and the Tao Te Ching certainly required that of me.
    Something deep within might nod in understanding, even though this part of me is not yet ready to explain it to my conscious mind. This is the approach I am taking in life these days, at least. There is so much my mind can not grip, I am but a single person, not even 30 years old yet and so I achknowledge that there is much I do not know - however, the depths of human conciousness continue to baffle me, as though we are portals unending, and I do believe that something within that, that depth, might understand things that I do not. And so, I read these riddles, and enjoyed doing so.

    "What cannot be seen is called the invisible.
    What cannot be heard is called the inaudible.
    What cannot be touched is called the intangible.
    These three cannot be examined and comprehended.
    And hence are mixed together as one.
    This “Oneness” is not much brighter in the sky, as It is not much dimmer on earth.
    It is not more glorious in a saint as It is not more fainter in an ordinary person.
    It is everlasting and cannot be named.
    It is the original void of “non-being.
    This “Oneness” is the Tao which is invisible, and formless."

    "Tao (The Way) can be infused into the nature and put to use without being exhausted.
    It is so deep and subtle like an abyss that is the origin of all things.
    It is complete and perfect as a wholeness that can
    Round off sharp edges;
    Resolve confusion;
    Harmonize with the glory;
    Act in unity with the lowliness.
    Tao is so profound and yet in invisible, It exists in everywhere and anywhere.
    I don not know whose Son It is, It existed before heaven and earth."

    "Tao exists in the universe like the rivers and streams that lead to the ocean."

    The book itself is more than 2000 years old. It was written - most likely - by Laozi (sometimes spelled Lao Tsu etc.), who is believed to have lived ca. 6th to 5th century BC. Laozi, 老子, was not his born name, but a title or given name meaning something like "Old Master". There are several legends about him, but he is without a doubt best known for the Tao Te Ching, and the foundation of Taoism.

    Laozi also wrote about virtues or treasures in life. He mentions humbleness several times, and this is something I have given some thought to already. I admire and aspire to be humble, and have held this as a personal virtue for some years. However, it is so close to the word humiliation in my first language, norwegian, and this connotation sparked a doubt: Ydmyket - Humiliated and Ydmykhet - Humility . The problem persists somewhat in english as well, humility and humiliation. Sometimes I have wondered, perhaps because of this negative association with humiliation, if humility - or humbleness - is not good for me after all. Perhaps I should instead be proud, loud, push my way to the top! But no, that is not me. It might be in other peoples nature, but it is not in mine. While I find it immensely important to pat myself on the shoulder from time to time and be proud, I prefer, personally, to keep it to myself. Both Seneca and Laozi preferred this way of living, and I do as well - however I do not know if it is right for everyone.

    I have Three Treasures that I hold and guard.
    The first is Kindness.
    The second is Simplicity.
    The third is Humbleness.
    With Kindness, one can be courageous.
    With Simplicity, one can be generous.
    With Humbleness, one can be the lead to provide guidance.
    "A person of great virtue is like the flowing water."


    Laozi also introduced me to a new concept, wuwei. Wuwei was not mentioned directly in the translations I read of the Tao Te Ching, what was mentioned was to act effortlessly. I was curious what this meant exactly, and in my research I found the Taoist concept wuwei (which may or may not have been the word used in the original text). Literally, it means doing nothing but as a philosophical concept it is understood as a form of effortless action. Allowing life to unfold itself without the need to control everything. Much can be done with only small changes, one does not have to be rough and controlling in order to build a life. Wuwei is perhaps also a form of connectedness allowing you to live effortlessly by following the Way, moving with the flow of Tao. I have been in a similar state of mind before. Sometimes in life things are just much easier, they run much smoother - perhaps that was wuwei, the feeling I had of being on a path, guided by something greater. I remember the feeling very well, and I see glimpses of it every now and then.

    One thing that fascinates me when it comes to taoism is the connection that is has made with Christianity. I am not a christian myself although it is very common where I come from, and my image of Christianity is certainly shaped by its ugly history. In fact I have a great deal of disgust for Christianity, which has been the cause of many gruesome and horrible things. However, I also see that there is a philosophical - or spiritual - core to it, and while some peoples idea of God is warped and terrible, others hail from true experience. Perhaps Christianity should be divided into two; Those who believe in hatred and punishment, and those who believe in love and mercy. I respect the christians who believe in love. There truly are many of them who have felt this strange phenomenon that is God, as I have as well. And while we do not know what God is, the Tao Te Chings relationship with Christianity reminded me of that.
    While taoism might attract many new age spiritualists today, it first became popular in the west through christians - and this was also the case with Buddhism, I believe. While some missionaries were studying and translating Taoism, other missionaries traveled to my land, Sápmi, and studied our indigenous religion with great fascination; although they did end up burning everything connected to it, including people.
    What is Tao? Christians compared it to Logos, a term I was even more surprised to find with ties to Christianity. Logos is after all, the parent of the word logic. Logos means word, and in the chinese bible, The Word (logos) was translated to Tao at one point (and maybe still).
    In the beginning was the Word In the beginning was Logos In the beginning was Tao
    I personally believe one should be careful shaping interpretations to fit our own worldview, but of course that is an ideal impossible to live by fully. While the relationship between logos, God and Tao is interesting, it shouldn't take up too much space in your mind while reading. As I mentioned earlier; I advice you to listen without the need of understanding.

    "Tao (The Way) that can be spoken of is not the Constant Tao
    The name that can be named is not a Constant Name.
    Nameless, is the origin of Heaven and Earth;
    The named is the Mother of all things.
    Thus, the constant void enables one to observe the true essence.
    The constant being enables one to see the outward manifestations.
    These two come paired from the same origin.
    But when the essence is manifested,
    It has a different name.
    This same origin is called “The Profound Mystery.”
    As profound the mystery as It can be,
    It is the Gate to the essence of all life."


    Fields

    Metaphysics

    Meta ∙ beyond - Physics ∙ nature

    Metaphysics explores the fundamental nature of reality and existence. It delves into profound questions about being, knowing, identity, time, space, and the interconnectedness of mind and body. This branch of philosophy helps address questions like, «What is real?» and «Why are we here?» by probing the underlying reasons behind our existence and the nature of the universe itself.

    Metaphysics is divided into the branches ontology which focuses on the study of «being» itself, and cosmology, which examines the origins, evolution, and structure of the universe.

    Major schools of thought related to metaphysics are:

    Metaphysical realism
    The world exists regardsless and independently of our perception and experience of it.

    Metaphysical idealism
    There is no external reality, it exists only within our minds.

    Metaphysical materialism
    Everything that exists is matter.

    Metaphysical determinism
    Every event in the universe is causally inevitable.

    Axiology

    Axios ∙ worthy - Logos ∙ study of

    Axiology is the philosophical study of value. Also called value theory, axiology is associated with social sciences like economics, sociology, anthropology, and psychology.

    Value is the worth of something, usually understood as a degree that covers both positive and negative magnitudes corresponding to the terms good and bad. Values influence many human endeavors related to emotion, decision-making, and action.

    Value theorists distinguish between intrinsic and instrumental value. An entity has intrinsic value if it is good in itself, independent of external factors. Axiology is divided into the subcategories ethics (the study of moral values) and aesthetics (the study of beauty and taste). Within the field of ethics, we'll find other branches like political philosophy, in which many renowned schools of thought have grown, such as liberalism, conservatism and anarchism - but these will need their own room later in my notes.

    Some schools of thought within the field of axiology are:

    Value realism
    Values are objective facts and should have nothing to do with preferances or sujective opinion.

    Value anti-realism
    Value is more complex.

    Epistemology

    Episteme ∙ knowledge - Logos ∙ study of

    Epistemology is the branch of philosophy that examines the nature, origin, and limits of knowledge. Epistemologists study the concepts of belief, truth, and justification to understand the nature of knowledge. To discover how knowledge arises, they investigate sources of justification, such as perception, introspection, memory, reason, and testimony.

    Some schools of thought within epistemology are:

    Scepticism
    It is impossible to know anything at all (Acatalepsy)
    or
    We must be diligent to question even the most mundane of knowledge (Suspension of judgment - the opposite of prejudice)

    Fallibism
    Absolute knowledge is impossible and unnecessary; we must keep an open and inquisitive mind and search for knowledge regardless. No complete and simple answer exists.

    Empiricism
    Knowledge comes only from sensory experience and observation; one should avoid deductive reasoning.

    Rationalism
    Reason (logic) is the greatest source and test of knowledge.

    Logos

    Logos ∙ word - Logikē tekhnē ∙ the craft of reason

    One might consider logos the area of philosophy that studies the scope and nature of logic, and this would not be wrong. The term Logos is used mainly in Western philosophy, psychology and rhetoric, but also Cristianity, giving it a second, more mystical layer of interpretation. Logic is often seen as the study of the laws of thought, correct reasoning, valid inference, or logical truth.
    Logic is broadly divided into categories:

    Deductive
    Deductive logic is one of the most important types of philosophy that deals with valid reasoning. It allows us to determine whether conclusions are true based on the information we have. For example, if all humans are mortal, and Socrates is a human, then using deductive logic, we can conclude that Socrates is mortal.

    Inductive
    Inductive logic, on the other hand, focuses on resolving specific problems based on patterns or observations, though the conclusion may not always be guaranteed as true. For instance, after observing that the sun has risen every day in the past, we might inductively conclude that it will rise again tomorrow.

    Symbolic Logic
    This type of logic uses symbols and formal systems to represent logical expressions. It focuses on the structure of arguments, reducing statements to symbols (like in mathematics) to evaluate their validity. For example, it might use symbols like ∧ (and), ∨ (or), and → (implies) to create logical formulas.

    Informal Logic
    In contrast, informal logic deals with everyday reasoning and arguments without the use of formal symbols. It focuses on evaluating arguments in natural language, identifying fallacies, and assessing whether the reasoning is sound or flawed.


    Schools of thought

    Stoicism

    From stoa poikilê - a porch in Athens decorated with mural paintings, where the very first of the philosophers we now consider stoic taught and congregated. Stoicism was founded Athens, Agora, by Zeno of Citium ca. 300 BCE.
    The Stoics believed that to acchieve eudaimonia - a well-lived life, one must live a life of virtue. The four cardinal virtues - prudence, fortitude, temperance, and justice — would have to be part of ones everyday life, as well as living in accordance with nature.

    «Virtue is the only good» for human beings according to Stoicism. External things such as health, wealth and pleasure, are neither good or bad, but «material for virtue to act upon».
    Today, stoicism is commonly known as a way of being, an attitude towards life. In stoicism, one is adviced never to be too positive, too hopeful; frankly one should expect the worst. "No man is crushed by misfortune unless he has first been deceived by prosperity," according to stoicism. It seems bleak, but at heart, stoics believed that this mental preparation would aid in overcoming even the most terrible of events. And if, at some point, there was no way onwards, stoics reminded themselves calmly that death awaits for every man and woman.

    Hedonism

    From greek hēdonē - pleasure. Hedonists believe that happiness or pleasure should be the chief goal in life.

    Hedonism can be divided into several branches.

    Psychological hedonism
    The underlying motivation of all human behavior is to maximize pleasure and avoid pain. People only help others when they expect a personal benefit.
    Axiological hedonism
    Pleasure is the sole source of intrinsic value. Other things, like knowledge and money, only have value insofar as they produce pleasure and reduce pain.
    Prudential hedonism
    Pleasure and pain are the only factors of well-being.
    Ethical hedonism
    People have a moral obligation to pursue pleasure and avoid pain.

    Outside the academic context, hedonism is a pejorative term for an egoistic lifestyle seeking short-term gratification.

    Marxism

    Marx - from philosopher Karl Marx

    Marxism is a social, economic, and political philosophy that originates with the works of German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. A core idea of marxism is that the world is split into multiple classes/groups of people - the main two being the working class and the capitalist/ruling class.
    Marxism has inspired many movements and fields, causing great variations in the understanding of the term.

    Taoism

    From Tao - way, road, path or technique

    Taoism holds that humans and animals should live in balance with the Tao, or the universe. Taoists believe in spiritual immortality, where the spirit of the body joins the universe after death.

    Several practices and traditions have developed with influence of taoism, such as including forms of meditation, astrology, qigong, feng shui, and internal alchemy. Taoist practice urges self-cultivation, a deeper appreciation of the Tao, and more harmonious existence.

    Relativism

    Relativism is the belief that there’s no absolute truth, only the truths that a particular individual or culture happen to believe. If you believe in relativism, then you think different people can have different views about what’s moral and immoral. Relativism is a family of philosophical views which deny claims to objectivity within a particular domain and assert that valuations in that domain are relative to the perspective of an observer or the context in which they are assessed. There are many different forms of relativism, with a great deal of variation in scope and differing degrees of controversy among them.

    Buddhism

    Buddhists believe that human life is a cycle of suffering and rebirth, but that if one achieves a state of enlightenment (nirvana), it is possible to escape this cycle forever. Siddhartha Gautama was the first person to reach this state of enlightenment and is still known today as the Buddha. Buddhism combines both philosophical reasoning and the practice of meditation.[6] The Buddhist religion presents a multitude of Buddhist paths to liberation; with the expansion of early Buddhism from ancient India to Sri Lanka and subsequently to East Asia and Southeast Asia, Buddhist thinkers have covered topics as varied as cosmology, ethics, epistemology, logic, metaphysics, ontology, phenomenology, the philosophy of mind, the philosophy of time, and soteriology in their analysis of these paths.

    Positivism

    Positivism is a philosophical school that holds that all genuine knowledge is either true by definition or positive – meaning a posteriori facts derived by reason and logic from sensory experience. Other ways of knowing, such as intuition, introspection, or religious faith, are rejected or considered meaningless. The basic affirmations of positivism are that all knowledge regarding matters of fact is based on the “positive” data of experience and that beyond the realm of fact is that of pure logic and pure mathematics. Positivism is the term used to describe an approach to the study of society that relies specifically on scientific evidence, such as experiments and statistics, to reveal a true nature of how society operates.

    Idealism

    Idealism is the metaphysical view that associates reality to ideas in the mind rather than to material objects. It lays emphasis on the mental or spiritual components of experience, and renounces the notion of material existence. Idealism in philosophy, also known as philosophical idealism or metaphysical idealism, is the set of metaphysical perspectives asserting that, most fundamentally, reality is equivalent to mind, spirit, or consciousness; that reality is entirely a mental construct; or that ideas are the highest type of reality or have the greatest claim to being considered «real». Because there are different types of idealism, it is difficult to define the term uniformly.

    Realism

    Realism philosophy is the view that an object or thing really exists and has certain attributes, independently of what people think about it. In other words, realism is the view that an object or thing has mind-independent reality. The viewpoint which accords to things which are known or perceived an existence or nature which is independent of whether anyone is thinking about or perceiving them.

    Pragmatism

    Pragmatism is a way of dealing with problems or situations that focuses on practical approaches and solutions—ones that will work in practice, as opposed to being ideal in theory. The word pragmatism is often contrasted with the word idealism, which means based on or having high principles or ideals. Pragmatism is a philosophical tradition that views language and thought as tools for prediction, problem solving, and action, rather than describing, representing, or mirroring reality. Pragmatists contend that most philosophical topics—such as the nature of knowledge, language, concepts, meaning, belief, and science—are best viewed in terms of their practical uses and successes.